Chess Forum
play-online-chess.com << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted by spurtus play-online-chess.com 1/08/2008 03:44:25 Play online chess |  Subject: SimplificationMessage: this is something I do a lot these days, the process of trying to win, even by the smallest of margins because I know what I need to secure the mate. OK, so I basically do not allow my opponent any counter play and simplifying whittles the position down to terms that prove the win. I can even somethings shun material when a more secure simplification is possible, I don't think a computer would play this, so this is a really human trait, but I wonder how correct this style of play is? My question is though, does anybody got any tips on how to do this or how they do this this because at the moment its just a subconscious process for me I havent been able to self analyse. Thanks, Spurtus. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted by tim_b play-online-chess.com 1/08/2008 12:51:16 Play online chess | Quite correct. Message: I'd be interested to hear more tips on simplification too. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted by ionadowman play-online-chess.com 1/09/2008 02:01:18 Play online chess | More than likely ... Message: First of all, in case anyone is wondering, what is "simplification"? I tend usually to think of simplification as the reduction, qualitatively and quantitatively, of the overall material in the game. Queen exchanges will generally be more simplifying than pawn exchanges, say, hence the "qualitative" aspect. However one might argue that more generally it is the antonym of "complication", and as such need not always imply reduction in material. Why simplify then? When material ahead, it is usually a good idea to simplify, reducing the overall material on either side whilst maintaining one's lead. Generally speaking it is good to exchange pieces when you are ahead; but when you are behind, exchanging pawns might well be in your interests. When you are material to the bad, you might well want to complicate the game, which generally means you want to keep the pieces on. When you are well ahead, you can even afford normally bad bargains in order to leave yourself with a straightforward continuation and the enemy no play at all. This is from an OTB game a few years ago: White: Ion; Black: Roland w In whis position, White had B for 2P, but Black's game looked pretty active. Rather than retreat the bishop, White opted to "simplify" in order to retain the initiative: 1.Bxh7+! Kxh7 - otherwise White just steals a pawn... 2.Qxf7+ Kh6 - The fact is, White had figured on earning quite a large dividend from his investment. Whatever Black plays, White will pick up at least the major exchange, Q for R. 3.Rd7 Rh8 - Only move to prevent mate. 4.Rd5 Qg7 5.Rd6+ Kh7 6.Qf5+ Kg8 7.Rg6 ... - Black must lose Q for R. 7...Rh7 8.Rxg7 ... - Maybe White was in too much of a hurry to simplify here. 8.Rxg5 keeps the pin and snaffles a pawn... 8...Rxg7 9.Qxc5 ... - but this one is also useful to have. Now, Black could have resigned here. His game is lost. But he thought Black still had an outside chance. 9...Rf8(?) - Hoping to capitalize on his mobile pawns. It shouldn't work, but White has a quick simplifying process to eliminate all outside chances for Black: 10.Qxf8+! ... Not at all hard to find (in fact I was surprised that my opponent had overlooked this possibility). 10...Kxf8 11.Rc8 Kf7 12.Rc7+ Kf3 13.Rxg7 Kg7 14.a4 ... - The point of all these exchanges: the pawn ending is lost for Black, as the BK cannot reach the a-pawn. w A much simpler and clearer situation for White than the previous diagrammed position! Occasionally it is the defender who will benefit from simplification. Possibly the following diagram isn't the best sort of example: b Here, Black could just get rid of the WP (1...Nxa5 2.Nxa5+...) and hope to survive the K+B+N vs K endgame. Though White would objectively be winning, this is a very difficult ending to master. Black has a better, more simplifying move: 1...Nc5+! 2.Nxc5 Kxc5 3.Be3+ Kb5 4.Bb6 Ka6 5.Kc4 Kb7 6.Kb5 Kb8 ... and so long as Black keeps in touch with his a8-square White can rant and rage at the city gates, but he ain't getting in. A book draw in fact, because White has the wrong bishop! I hope this gives a taste of what is meant by "simplification". If this topic proves interesting, I might post an annotated game that features simplification as a motif (among other exciting matters)... I would like to hear other views on this topic. Cheers, Ion ——— After Four Rounds of the Chess Olympiad, Several Favorites Have Fallen — Seven teams have won all of their matches through the first four rounds of the biennial Chess Olympiad. Four of those teams — the top two Russian teams, Hungary and Armenia — were ranked among the top six at the start, so their standing is no surprise. But three of the leaders — the Netherlands, the Republic of Georgia and Vietnam — are unexpected, in particular the last two, who were ranked No. 20 and 27, respectively, when the chess competition began. Several of the pre-tournament favorites ran into unexpected trouble early on. Ukraine, which was ranked No. 2, gave up a drawn match to Croatia, No. 28, in Round 3. (Matches are between teams of four players). Ukraine is now tied for ... Posted by marinvukusic | play-online-chess.com 1/12/2008 14:57:29 Play online chess That is what I call an explanation :)Message: I have a few remarks from purely competitive point of view. I have seen numerous times people making two related mistakes in complex but winning positions: trying to win with as big a "margin" or as spectacularly as possible. This means they are either trying to win by the greatest material difference or find a checkmate in a complicated position (sacrificing pieces along the way, hoping to find a mate somewhere). Both approaches are wrong - the best end result is 1 point in any case, so why complicate? Just win in the simplest way you know how. I will always take a 30-move surefire win (second Ion's diagram) if I can see it. Strong players tend to win frequently, BECAUSE they do not complicate - when they grab a surely winning advantage they CONVERT it pretty much every time. You can convert it 6 out of 10 times "beautifully" or 9 out of 10 "plainly" - your choice :) Sorry for caps, I cant underline on this board and the point is important :) ——— Yemen sacks chess team for playing against Israel — Yemen has sacked the country's chess team and members of the governing body after its players competed against Israel at a chess tournament in Belarus. The Yemeni Sports minister, Hamud Mohammed Ubad, took the unusual decision after chess players ignored instructions to pull out if drawn against Israel, which is widely criticised in the Middle East for its policies towards the Palestinians. "This was an individual action contrary to the policy of Yemen, which refuses any normalisation with Israel," said Mr Ubad, adding that the chess players were on their way home from Minsk. Like several other Middle Eastern countries, Yemen does not have diplomatic relations with Israel and bars ... Posted by marinvukusic | play-online-chess.com 1/12/2008 15:03:35 Play online chess To answer this questionMessage: It is easy to answer, and I did already - "Just win in the simplest way you know how." So in order to know what simplifications are good (and to be able to actually perform this regularly) you need to know how to win a number of different endgames. This is one element of what is commonly known as "chess technique". I suggest this link if you wnat to learn about endgames from strong players:  www.jeremysilman.com
Here are the subtitles: - "This series exposes the chess student to those endgames that every tournament player must become conversant in if he wishes to be successful." - "The three time Champion of the Republic of Moldova explores many kinds of instructive endgames for players 1500 on up." - "Tournament level endgame lessons by IM Silman" Have fun! ——— As Chess Olympiad Begins, No Surprises, but More Controversy — The first round of the Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia, on Tuesday did not produce any upsets, though a few high-ranked chess teams yielded a draw or two. According to the Olympiad’s Web site, there are 1,300 players from 144 countries. The Chess Olympiad, which was first held in 1927 (or 1924, unofficially), is convened every two years. The 2010 Olympiad is particularly important as elections for the top offices in the World Chess Federation, the game’s governing body, will be held near the end of the competition. Prior to the start of the Olympiad, it had been plagued by problems, including a race to finish building the main venues before the teams arrived. Now that the chess event has ... Posted by ionadowman | play-online-chess.com 1/14/2008 00:48:25 Play online chess Thanks ....Message: ... and your observations on becoming conversant with and confident in endgames can not be emphasized too strongly. Without having a well developed endgame technique, one will find it hard to judge the value of any exchange, "even" or otherwise. Not only that, but your opponent will use simplification as a weapon against you. And don't believe the endgame is boring. You will find in time that there is a lot of interest - tactical tricks and intriguing ideas - to be found even in the simplest ending. (I recall years ago playing through some Fischer-Smyslov games from, I think, the 1959 Candidates tournament, both sides having a pair of rooks a single minor piece, and a bunch of pawns - and they were thrillers). Here is a position to give some idea of tactics that can punctuate even a simple ending. I composed it originally to illustrate the "pin" motif for primary school players: b 1...Bc5 2.Rc1 Ra1 3.Rxa1 Bxd4+ 4.Kf1 Bxa1 5.Ke1 Bd4 6.Kd2 a3 7.Kc2 a2 8.Kb3 a1=Q etc. Or how about this? The motif cropped up in a recent annotated game. Here's the germ of the idea. w Suppose it were White to play. Does he win, draw or lose? Your call... Cheers, Ion ——— Chess Puzzles: Richard Reti's Marvelous Squares — A chessboard is a square, divided into 64 black and white squares. But there are more squares in chess, mostly invisible, as part of an amazing chess geometry hidden in chess players' minds. One classic square is often used in pawn endgames when a king is chasing the enemy's passed pawn. The king doesn't have to walk in horizontal or vertical lines, he can run diagonally or zig-zag across the field. But he needs to be close enough to catch the pawn. How close? The king has to walk into a square whose one side is defined as the distance between the pawn and its promoting square at the edge of the board. We can use a famous study by Richard Reti as an example. The world-class player ... Posted by ganstaman | play-online-chess.com 1/19/2008 11:06:18 Play online chess Message: www.chessgames.com
After white's 33rd, black is up 3 pawns and the exchange. So black gives back the exchange and gets to remove queens from the board, reaching an easily won rook and pawn endgame. ——— Lahno Wins Women’s World Blitz Chess Championship — To be good at blitz, or speed, chess, players must think quickly and have good tactical skills. That is why the best chess players under slow, or classical, chess time controls are not necessarily the best at the faster form of the game. Though only 20 years old, Kateryna Lahno of Ukraine has been among the best women players in the world for seven years and is now ranked No. 7. She is actually ranked higher than Alexandra Kosteniuk of Russia, the current women’s world chess champion, who is No. 10. She is clearly an excellent classical chess player and has won the European Individual Women’s Championship twice (in 2005 and 2008). Now she has proven that she may be even more adept at speed chess. ... Posted by mfeeney93 | play-online-chess.com 1/20/2008 20:38:33 Play online chess Basic case of simplicationMessage:  game Posted by ionadowman | play-online-chess.com 1/21/2008 15:17:19 Play online chess Good example ...Message: Here's another from a famous game Bogolyubov ve Alekhine, Hastings 1922 - a great game throughout its length, actually! But the diagram is taken from the 47th move, White having just played 47.Rh2-d2 b White's busted, of course, but Alekhine ends a spectacular game by reducing his lead to its simplest terms - rather like the process of crystallization. 47...Qe2! Leaving aside the obvious capture, what choices are available to White? The knight moves, rook is lost; rook moves along the rank, loses rook; rook moves off the rank, it's mate next. King moves; knight is lost with check, and if 48.f5 d5 forces White to think again. Black's 47th has certainly simplified White's decision! 48.Rxe2 fxe2 And now the pawn is attacking a piece that can't hit back! There's only one move to "prevent" promotion. 49.Kf2 exf1=Q+ 50.Kxf1 ... There it is: Black's advantage has crystallized out into a winning pawn ending. 50...Kg7 Note that Black doesn't touch his pawns, but gets his king into action real fast. The endgame is where the king lives. 51.Kf2 ... White does the same. He could have played 51.f5 but it would hardly have slowed Black down: 51.f5 Kf7 52.Ke2 Ke7 53.Ke3 d5 54.Kd3 (being cunning - after 54.Kd4 Kd6 55.Kany Ke5 etc) 54...Kd6 57.Kd4 Kc6 58.Kd3 Kc5 59.Kc3 d4+ 60.Kd3 Kd5 and the f-pawn will fall like a ripe berry into Black's lap. 51...Kf7 52.Ke3 Ke6 53.Ke4 d5+ - White resigned at this point. After 54.Kd4 Kf5 55.Kxd5 Kxf4 White hasn't a prayer of stopping the f-pawn. But let's see what might have happened (The following diagram is taken from the position that might have arisen after 55...Kxf4): w 56.Ke6 f5 57.Kf6 ... Even in a simple ("simple" in the sense we are using it for this discussion. "Simple" don't mean "easy"!) a simple ending like this, White tries to complicate. White's move has this idea in mind: 57...Ke4? 58.Kg6 f4 59.Kxh6 f3. 60.Kg7 f2 61.h6 f1=Q 62.h7... b Now, most of us know that a K+P can draw against a K+Q if the pawn is on the 7th, as an a-, c-, f- or h-pawn, and the enemy king is far off. Is the WK sufficiently far off here? White might hope so, but it seems Black can still win from this position: 62...Qg1+ 63.Kf8 (tricky...) Qd4 64.Kg8 Qd8+ 65.Kg7 Qd7+ 66.Kg8 Kf5 67.h8=Q Kg6 and White has no useful checks with which at once to avert mate and preserve his new-born queen. So White could have won anyway, but 57...Ke4 complicated matters needlessly. * So, from the second diagram; recapping: 56.Ke6 f5 57.Kf6 Kg4! 58.Kg6 f4 59.Kxh6 f3 60.Kg6 (can't go to g7 as the BK is attacking the h-pawn) f2 61.h6 f1=Q and - if 62.h7 Qf8 63.h8=Q (Forced! The WK has no moves!) 63...Qxh8 wins; - or if 61.Kg7 Black has picked up a tempo in the ending: 61...Kg5 62.h7 Qf6+ 63.Kg8 Qe7! (...Kg6 also wins, but 64.h8=N+ would be a real drag...) 64.h8=Q ... (64.h8=N Kf6 mates in 2) 64...Kg6 and again White has to give up his Q to survive another couple of moves. Well, >Whew!< I had fun with that. I just hope somebody reads it! Cheers Ion Posted by spurtus | play-online-chess.com 1/22/2008 03:46:32 Play online chess Message: Instead of cashing in on my queen and taking my opponents rook, I ended up losing a queen, and then the game. Here I should have simplified because there was not enough room on the board for 2 queens. Spurtus. Posted by longbow57 | play-online-chess.com 3/25/2008 21:15:42 Play online chess Simple Rule in Endgame play.Message: Posted by marinvukusic | play-online-chess.com 3/26/2008 04:21:07 Play online chess WrongMessage: Posted by marinvukusic | play-online-chess.com 3/26/2008 05:48:25 Play online chess For beginnersMessage: www.chesscorner.com
"When you have more material than your opponent, exchange pieces not pawns." "When you have less material than your opponent, exchange pawns not pieces." Pretty basic stuff but very important to clearly understand. Posted by chessnovice | play-online-chess.com 3/26/2008 09:56:37 Play online chess ...Message: Posted by ionadowman | play-online-chess.com 3/26/2008 17:24:05 Play online chess It has been pointed out to me...Message: Here's the position again: w After 56.Ke6 Kg5 is much the simpler (as in more straightforward) method. If White tries to get behind Black's pawns, the f-pawn just runs in to queen. If instead 57.Kd5 Black has a wide choice of winning moves (57...f5, 57...Kf4, 57...Kg4) but simplest is 57...Kxh5, after which White can whistle for counterplay (58.Ke4 Kg4 etc.). How did I overlook this? Don't know. Though I don't recall, exactly, its possible - even likely - I wanted to illustrate the more complicated line before returning to the simpler one, but forgot my intention. Or it was just a simple oversight. We'll never know... Cheers, Ion |